One of my partners pointed out the following court case to me. In this case, the company was assessed full penalties for failure to deposit employment tax withholdings, even though the owner/officers were completely unaware it was occurring. The owner apparently had no earthly idea his in-house personnel were failing to perform their payroll tax responsibilities. Only a portion of the withholdings were not properly paid the Treasury, so even a close review of the financial statements might not have triggered a question. A recommendation would be that someone, not in the line of responsibility, occasionally review the payroll deposit and reporting compliance. This case may be the most compelling argument for a company to use a third party payroll service. We’re an accounting firm, and we outsource our payroll!
Don Johnson Motors, Inc. v. U.S.,
DC TX, 101 AFTR 2d 2008-370 , Civil Action No. B-06-047, 12/21/07
A district court has ruled that employment tax penalties and interest for the 1999-2002 tax years could not be abated due to reasonable cause, even though the taxpayer was unaware that its in-house accountant and its office manager had failed to perform their payroll tax duties. However, the court said that there may be reasonable cause to abate an employment tax assessment for the 2003-2004 tax years because of a bank error.
Employee error. From 1999 to 2002, Don Johnson Motors, Inc. delegated its payroll tax functions to an in-house accountant, Michael Ezequiel, who performed his role under the supervision of the company's office manager. Ezequiel prepared the company's employment tax returns and was also in charge of monitoring the payroll accounts and the information included on Forms 940 and 941. At some point in 1999, for reasons not explained, Ezequiel stopped paying portions of the company's payroll taxes. As a result, Don Johnson Motors made incomplete deposits to the IRS from 1999-2002. The executives of Don Johnson Motors were unaware of this problem until December 2002. Shortly thereafter, the IRS assessed penalties against the company for failure to file employment tax returns and to timely pay taxes.
Exception to penalty. Code Sec. 6651(a) allows an employer to avoid penalties for noncompliance if it can show that its failure to file, pay, or deposit taxes was due to “reasonable cause” and not willful neglect. Don Johnson Motors requested an abatement of the aforementioned penalties based on Code Sec. 6651(a).
Ruling on employee error. The district court denied the taxpayer's abatement request. In issuing its ruling, it noted that other federal courts have consistently held that the failure of a taxpayer's employee to file or pay taxes does not establish reasonable cause. The district court also distinguished the current ruling from the case of American Biomaterials Corporation, 69 AFTR 2d 92-611 (1992). In American Biomaterials, the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ruled that there may be reasonable cause to abate employment tax penalties when corporate officers commit criminal acts (e.g., embezzlement) against the corporation. The district court distinguished the Don Johnson Motors case from that one by pointing out that Don Johnson Motors had never presented any evidence that its in-house accountant and its office manager had engaged in any criminal action. The district court said that the employment tax deficiencies incurred by Don Johnson Motors simply resulted from having “lax internal controls or failing to secure competent external auditors that even the court in American Biomaterials stated was insufficient to establish reasonable cause.” The district court also rejected the taxpayer's argument that there was reasonable cause to abate the penalties because of the lack of notification from IRS that the company was falling behind in its tax obligations. The court cited Code Sec. 6151 and said that IRS was under no obligation to provide taxpayers with notice that they failed to file their returns or pay their taxes.